|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swimming
with King Cobras
By Phil Oakley
|
During Easter 2002, I took part
in an eight day caving reconnaissance expedition in Thailand. This was
my third caving expedition to Thailand. With three other caving colleagues
we discovered a new system in the little explored and remote Thungyai Wildlife
Sanctuary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
“Snake! Get out of the water”, I shouted leaping from the
river and clinging to the cave wall.
It should not have been there: They don’t normally go into caves, certainty
not this far in and I was at least 100m into the cave. “You were very
calm and controlled”, said Terry, a fellow team member, later that night.
To me it was more of a panic reaction. When a King Cobra swims out at you
in a narrow stream passage, instincts tell you to move fast. While I clung
there I thought “you silly idiots” as the others stood in the water. “Well,
you had the only ledge to stand on!” said Terry. They hadn’t quite understood
why I was clinging to the wall otherwise we would all have been competing
for the only ledge.
This was the last day, of an eight-day reconnaissance trip in the Thungyai
Naresuan West Wildlife Sanctuary, Thailand. I had gone out
to help Dean Smart find new caves in this relatively unexplored region.
Dean works for the Royal Thai Forestry Department as their speleologist.
He needed a small team of experienced expedition cavers to explore an area
with great potential. Our expedition team consisted of Dean (Expedition
Leader), Terry Bolger (Canberra Caving Society, Australia), Paul Johnson
(Torne Valley Caving Club, England) and myself, Phil Oakley (Combined Services
Caving Association, England).
The first phase of our expedition was to follow-up on a 1984 report by
a Swedish caver, Bill Odell who claimed to
have found 40 caves along a stretch of the Mae Klong river. The
second phase was to identify possible cave resurgences
in the southwestern part of the sanctuary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thungyai Naresuan
West Wildlife Sanctuary
Entry into the Thungyai Wildlife Sanctuary is strictly controlled and limited
to research purposes only. The sanctuary lies next to
the border with Burma, 300km NW of Bangkok. It encompasses part of a
huge karst region some 12,000km2 in size and consequently, a large proportion of the sanctuary is limestone
karst. Mountain peaks rise to over 1800m and are
covered predominantly in primary forestation. The sanctuary provides
a home to tiger, bear, gaur, wild water buffalo, elephant
and many other endangered species. A few hill tribes also
live in the forest. There are problems with
poaching and forest fires.
A network of ranger stations, linked by rough dirt tracks, provides the
basic infrastructure in the region. During March/April the climate is hot
and dry, water levels are very low and the number of mosquitoes is minimal.
Normally this region of Thailand is malarial. Other dangers in the area
are attacks form large animals, hence the need for armed ranger support
during the expedition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It took 7½ hours from Bangkok by bus and truck to reach the Sanctuary’s
new HQ. The following day (Monday 1 April) we set off to find our first
cave. After a ½ hour drive from the Sanctuary HQ followed by a two hour
trek on foot through the forest we located the cave at the base of a limestone
outcrop. The 10m wide entrance descended a gentle slope into a large chamber
about 15m wide by 25m deep and 10m high. There was obvious evidence that
locals used the cave, as Suthep – our main ranger guide - came out with
cold bottled water! At the back of the chamber was a small opening into
another smaller chamber with bats swooping through. The back room was blind.
A rift on the left side became very narrow after about 3-4 m. The survey
gave a total length of 46m. The cave was named Tham Khi Mao (Drunkard's
Cave) after the guide’s corpulent drinking habit!
The following day (Tuesday 2 April) we took a 2 hour truck ride deeper
into the Sanctuary to the original Wildlife Sanctuary HQ at Song Thai.
From here we walked the 6 km (3hrs) down to the Nam Chon area of the Mae
Khlong river where our base was to be for the next three nights. Our group
consisted of Dean, Terry, Paul and myself, Suthep and four other Thai rangers.
The walk was straight forward following a defined track, however the 400
C temperature and heavy packs made it hard work. We arrived at base
camp and were pleasantly surprised to find a raised wooden platform with
a nearby tributary river providing a water supply. We were expecting to
be sleeping in the forest with no facilities.
On the first evening a quick reconnaissance of the small valley behind
base camp was undertaken. A large, draughting boulder fall with a resurging
river was soon discovered. After scrambling and searching among the boulders
for an hour, all openings were found to quickly end and
a way through to the cave behind could not
be found.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bamboo Rafting
The next day a reconnaissance of the main river was done. Initially we
started along the riverbank but with steep, rocky banks covered in heavy
vegetation and in temperatures of 40 o C, the going was slow
and tough. After about ¾ hr of making very little headway, Terry and Dean
decided to take to the river. It was not long before we were all floating
down stream on bamboo poles. The river was about 30 m wide and slow flowing
which made a very pleasant and relaxing way to look for caves! Three sections
of small rapids were encountered which were easily negotiated by floating
through them. This reconnaissance day proved fruitless for finding significant caves. None of the small tributaries marked
on the map had resurgences and the rock at river level was mostly non-limestone.
The few small holes that were
found went nowhere. At 2km from base camp a major dry tributary (Huai Pa Chi/Huai Du Ngae)
was encountered entering from the west. No evidence of a resurgence could be
found.
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At this 2km point we decided to start on the swim back up-stream before
dark. Although enjoyable, this was not a very efficient way to explore at
river level. A future expedition would benefit from using kayaks or some
other small boat. However, getting boats into the area would require a
lot of effort.
On Thursday we resumed our reconnaissance behind base camp. We split into
two groups: Dean and myself went up a dry riverbed. We found nothing
except a python. Thick vegetation and high temperatures made our progress
slow and hard going. Our search ended after about 1km at the bottom of
what would be a 20m waterfall during the rainy season.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unchartered Territory
Terry and Paul returned to the boulder field from the first nights reconnaissance.
They found the entrance within minutes of walking into the boulder field!
After exploring a small dry upper chamber they found a way through at the
back, which led to a drop of about 8m through boulders into the river passage.
Containing their excitement they went about 150m upstream to see if it actually
had potential and it did. We met up at base camp for a quick lunch – accompanied
with a buzz of excitement. We returned to the cave and dropped into the
main system at 1pm and surfacing again 8½ hours latter.
We had discovered a brand new cave system in Thailand. The active river
passage was followed and averaged about 5m wide by 10m high. The rock structure
was very sharp and brittle and fractured very easily. This made climbing
over boulders hazardous and dangerous. On several occasions, a rock ledge fractured whilst someone was standing
on it. At the first boulder fall a way over
was found on the left-hand side. After 500m
of large river passage, a very large boulder room
was encountered approximately 80m wide by 30m
high. A steep 10-20m scramble on a very loose and dangerous slope up
the left-hand side ended in a hazardous 3m vertical climb before topping
out. On the top of the boulders were three large standing stalagmites (approximately
5-6m high, 2m diameter) along with others that had fallen over. Loose rock and debris made scrambling
across the top and climbing down the other side very hazardous.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing for a further 600m the team stopped
having entered the cave three hours previously. The stream passage continued
on with similar dimensions. The survey showed a
total of 1.1km of river passage and a gradient of 7o.
The cave was called Tham Huai Tong Thai after the stream.
The main sink for Huai Tong
Thai is 3km from the resurgence and 225m higher in elevation. Maps suggest that other potential
sinks exist up to 7km
away and
nearly 500m
higher.
We could have pushed the new system further over the following days however,
Dean wanted to reconnoitre other areas as per the expedition objective.
Disappointed, we moved on but plans are underway for a return expedition
in April 2003 to fully explore the system.
The next day (Friday 5 April) we walked out from Nam Chon
back to Song Thai ranger station. A quick investigation of the main Huai
Tong Thai sink found it to be choked. After lunch, base camp was
moved to Thi Khong ranger station, a one-hour
drive south from Song Thai. Along the way,
one of the potential sinks for Tham
Huai Tong Thai, the sink of Huai Du Ngae was briefly explored. It was choked with vegetation and debris. A small shaft
also found next to the road
dropped vertically for several meters but was not
descended since the group
did not have any vertical kit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Saturday 6 April we visited a known cave, about
two-hour trek from the ranger station. The cave
entrance was easily located with the help of the park rangers. The rangers
had been into the entrance before but had not gone further
than the start of a deep-water section about 50m inside. After 20m, the deep-water section turned a 90°
corner and sumped. The cave was called Tham Huai Pom Phi
after the local name of the stream. A dry
upper level bypass ended at
a 2m drop back into the deep-water section
beneath. In this dry section were some interesting unidentified insects.
Several leeches about 30mm long were on the cave walls. Twenty to thirty bats were present
and 3-4 catfish were seen swimming in the dark, deep water. The
cave fauna may prove to be interesting
and further studies are needed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
King Cobra Cave
On Sunday 7 April we departed on a three-hour truck journey to the
southwestern corner of the sanctuary near to Khao Laem Dam reservoir. This was to be the last area for
reconnaissance. Thick smoke from numerous forest fires hung in the air obscuring
the sun. On the Monday we set out on foot to an
area that had been identified as having a potential
cave resurgence. The walk passed local tribes and areas of farmed land.
Despite this being a habitated area, nobody seemed
to know of any caves or be able (or willing) to offer any kind of help.
After about 2 hours a small stream was followed to the base of a 500m wide
limestone ridge where a boulder chocked resurgence was found. After a scramble
around the bottom of the cliff and cutting through undergrowth, an upper
entrance was found. This dropped into the stream just behind the boulder choke.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I was in front, checking all the time for anything unpleasant. Initially
the stream passage varied from two to three meters wide and five meters
in height. After about 50 meters the passage narrowed to about one meter
wide and 10 meters high. I had just emerged from a chest-deep water section
and was about to go back down into water when I saw it swim towards me,
less than three metres away, and closing. The others were still in the
water close behind me. The young King Cobra came out about one metre and
then stood its ground, head up and tasting the air. It had nowhere to go
except to swim past us. The four of us stood and watched to see if it would
do anything: It was a stand off.
So, that was it. We could not complete this particular cave. We backed
off carefully – hoping it wouldn’t follow us - and started our survey 20m
down stream. The rest of the cave is there for a future expedition group
to finish! We named the cave Tham Jong Ang (King Cobra Cave) with a surveyed
length of 93m. What lies beyond the King Cobra
remains unknown. It certainly has the potential to go all the way through
the ridge.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On the Tuesday a
4x4 truck
was supposed take us to another cave about 2hrs away, but it did
not arrive. Since we had to head back to Bangkok the following day, an afternoon
of R & R was spent in the Burma/Thai frontier town of Sangkhlaburi.
The next day (Wednesday 10 April) we returned
to Bangkok which took 10hours by public bus.
|
|
|
|
Overall, this 8-day reconnaissance proved very successful. A total 1.3km of cave passage was surveyed and areas for future exploration were identified.
There is the potential for a very large
system at Tham Huai Tong Thai. Caves with interesting fauna were
found that require further study. A return expedition is being planned for April 2003 to continue the
exploration.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |